CD20/MS4A1 is a mammalian olfactory receptor expressed in a subset of olfactory sensory neurons that mediates innate avoidance of predators.

The mammalian olfactory system detects and discriminates between millions of odorants to elicit appropriate behavioral responses. While much has been learned about how olfactory sensory neurons detect odorants and signal their presence, how specific innate, unlearned behaviors are initiated in response to ethologically relevant odors remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the 4-transmembrane protein CD20, also known as MS4A1, is expressed in a previously uncharacterized subpopulation of olfactory sensory neurons in the main olfactory epithelium of the murine nasal cavity and functions as a mammalian olfactory receptor that recognizes compounds produced by mouse predators. While wildtype mice avoid these predator odorants, mice genetically deleted of CD20 do not appropriately respond. Together, this work reveals a CD20-mediated odor-sensing mechanism in the mammalian olfactory system that triggers innate behaviors critical for organismal survival.

5 signature genes revealed by single-cell profiling identified unique immune subtypes affecting the prognosis of ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer (OC) ranks among the most prevalent gynecological malignancies, with surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy constituting primary treatment modalities. However, despite advancements, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has yielded suboptimal outcomes. The pressing need to identify biomarkers predictive of clinical prognosis underscores our objective. We aim to discern gene signatures and establish prognostic subgroups, specifically in the context of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, guiding clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Tumor Immunotherapy Gene Expression Resource (TIGER) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases to extract signature genes of prognostic significance. Unsupervised consensus clustering was employed to classify patients based on these signature genes. The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) database, along with the R packages "maftools" and "ESTIMATE" facilitated immune infiltration estimation. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis were implemented to probe immune-related cell signaling pathways among distinct subtypes. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) database was used to assess immunotherapy effects, while the R package "OncoPredict" evaluated drug sensitivity differences among subtypes. RESULTS: We identified five prognostically influential genes in ovarian cancer: IGFBP7, JCHAIN, CCDC80, VSIG4, and MS4A1. Utilizing these signature genes, we categorized TCGA-OV patients into five clusters, each associated with varying clinical prognoses. Notably, 2 clusters exhibited superior prognoses, accompanied by enhanced immune cell infiltration. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed their heightened enrichment in cellular immunity and immune cell interaction pathways. Given the elevated expression levels of multiple immune checkpoint molecules, these clusters may substantially benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Additionally, chemotherapy sensitivity analysis indicated their favorable responses to first or second-line chemotherapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: We subclustered ovarian cancer patients by 5 signature genes obtained from the Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset, which demonstrated a good typing effect. Patients in the two molecular subtypes showed better survival, higher immune cell infiltration, and higher drug sensitivity. This meticulous typing may help clinicians to quickly assess the prognosis of patients and the response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Drugs Targeting CD20 in Multiple Sclerosis: Pharmacology, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability.

Currently, there are four monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the cluster of differentiation (CD) 20 receptor available to treat multiple sclerosis (MS): rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. B-cell depletion therapy has changed the therapeutic landscape of MS through robust efficacy on clinical manifestations and MRI lesion activity, and the currently available anti-CD20 mAb therapies for use in MS are a cornerstone of highly effective disease-modifying treatment. Ocrelizumab is currently the only therapy with regulatory approval for primary progressive MS. There are currently few data regarding the relative efficacy of these therapies, though several clinical trials are ongoing. Safety concerns applicable to this class of therapeutics relate primarily to immunogenicity and mechanism of action, and include infusion-related or injection-related reactions, development of hypogammaglobulinemia (leading to increased infection and malignancy risk), and decreased vaccine response. Exploration of alternative dose/dosing schedules might be an effective strategy for mitigating these risks. Future development of biosimilar medications might make these therapies more readily available. Although anti-CD20 mAb therapies have led to significant improvements in disease outcomes, CNS-penetrant therapies are still needed to more effectively address the compartmentalized inflammation thought to play an important role in disability progression.

Relevance of CD20 antigen expression among paediatric patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Literature regarding prognostic relevance of CD20 antigen expression among paediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) patients is sparse and contradictory. We analysed clinical laboratory parameters and survival characteristics pertinent to CD20 expression among 224 treatment-naïve paediatric B-ALL patients. 50% patients had CD20 expression (CD20+ B-ALL). There was no difference in the clinical & laboratory presentation and end of induction measurable residual disease (EOI-MRD) status according to CD20 expression. As compared to CD20- B-ALL patients, CD20+ B-ALL patients had two times more relapse (16% vs. 29%, p = 0.034), inferior relapse-free survival (79% vs. 66%, p = 0.025) but no difference in overall survival (75% vs. 69%, p = 0.126). Similar to high-risk NCI status and EOI-MRD positivity, CD20 expression was an independent predictor for inferior relapse-free survival (HR: 1.860, 95% CI: 1.008-3.432, p = 0.047). Compared to baseline, there was a significant increase in CD20-expressing EOI-residual blasts among CD20- B-ALL patients (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.001). EOI residual blasts of both CD20+ and CD20- patients had three times increased normalized CD20 expression intensity (nCD20), with the intensity among CD20- B-ALL patients reaching the pretreatment nCD20 of CD20+ B-ALL patients (4.9 vs. 3.6, p = 0.666). Rituximab can be considered in managing EOI-MRD-positive CD20- B-ALL patients as the residual blasts of these patients have quantitative and qualitative increases in CD20 expression.

Molecular assessment of intratumoral immune cell subsets and potential mechanisms of resistance to odronextamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) have a significant need for effective treatment options. Odronextamab is an Fc-silenced, human, CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody that targets CD20-expressing cells via T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity independent of T-cell/major histocompatibility complex interaction. Phase I results in patients with R/R B-NHL demonstrated that odronextamab monotherapy could achieve deep and durable responses with a generally manageable safety profile (ELM-1; NCT02290951). As part of a biomarker analysis of the same study, we investigated potential biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to odronextamab. METHODS: Patients with R/R B-NHL enrolled in ELM-1 received one time per week doses of intravenous odronextamab for 4×21 day cycles, then doses every 2 weeks thereafter. Patient tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline, on-treatment, and at progression. Immune cell markers were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: Baseline tumor biopsies showed that almost all patients had high proportions of B cells that expressed the CD20 target antigen, whereas expression of other B-cell surface antigens (CD19, CD22, CD79b) was more variable. Responses to odronextamab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were not related to the relative level of baseline CD20 expression, cell of origin, or high-risk molecular subtype. A potential link was observed between greater tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and increased likelihood of response to odronextamab. Similarly, a trend was observed between clinical response and increased levels of CD8 T cells and regulatory T cells at baseline. We also identified an on-treatment pharmacodynamic shift in intratumoral immune cell subsets. Finally, loss of CD20 expression through inactivating gene mutations was identified as a potential mechanism of resistance in patients who were treated with odronextamab until progression, as highlighted in two detailed patient cases reported here. CONCLUSIONS: This biomarker analysis expands on clinical findings of odronextamab in patients with R/R B-NHL, providing verification of the suitability of CD20 as a therapeutic target, as well as evidence for potential mechanisms of action and resistance.

Neutropenia following immune-depletion, notably CD20 targeting, therapies in multiple sclerosis.

Neutropenia serves as a risk factor for severe infection and is a consequence of some immune-depleting immunotherapies. This occurs in people with multiple sclerosis following chemotherapy-conditioning in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and potent B cell targeting agents. Whilst CD52 is expressed by neutrophils and may contribute to early-onset neutropenia following alemtuzumab treatment, deoxycytidine kinase and CD20 antigen required for activity of cladribine tablets, off-label rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab are not or only weakly expressed by neutrophils. Therefore, alternative explanations are needed for the rare occurrence of early and late-onset neutropenia following such treatments. This probably occurs due to alterations in the balance of granulopoiesis and neutrophil removal. Neutrophils are short-lived, and their removal may be influenced by drug-associated infections, the killing mechanisms of the therapies and amplified by immune dyscrasia due to influences on neutropoiesis following growth factor rerouting for B cell recovery and cytokine deficits following lymphocyte depletion. This highlights the small but evident neutropenia risks following sustained B cell depletion with some treatments.

Loss of CD20 expression as a mechanism of resistance to mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas.

ABSTRACT: CD20 is an established therapeutic target in B-cell malignancies. The CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibody mosunetuzumab has significant efficacy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Because target antigen loss is a recognized mechanism of resistance, we evaluated CD20 expression relative to clinical response in patients with relapsed and/or refractory NHL in the phase 1/2 GO29781 trial investigating mosunetuzumab monotherapy. CD20 was studied using immunohistochemistry (IHC), RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing performed centrally in biopsy specimens collected before treatment at predose, during treatment, or upon progression. Before treatment, most patients exhibited a high proportion of tumor cells expressing CD20; however, in 16 of 293 patients (5.5%) the proportion was <10%. Analyses of paired biopsy specimens from patients on treatment revealed that CD20 levels were maintained in 29 of 30 patients (97%) vs at progression, where CD20 loss was observed in 11 of 32 patients (34%). Reduced transcription or acquisition of truncating mutations explained most but not all cases of CD20 loss. In vitro modeling confirmed the effects of CD20 variants identified in clinical samples on reduction of CD20 expression and missense mutations in the extracellular domain that could block mosunetuzumab binding. This study expands the knowledge about the occurrence of target antigen loss after anti-CD20 therapeutics to include CD20-targeting bispecific antibodies and elucidates mechanisms of reduced CD20 expression at disease progression that may be generalizable to other anti-CD20 targeting agents. These results also confirm the utility of readily available IHC staining for CD20 as a tool to inform clinical decisions. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

A transmembrane scaffold from CD20 helps recombinant expression of a chimeric claudin 18.2 in an in vitro coupled transcription and translation system.

Cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) is a nonglycosylated, multispanning transmembrane protein specifically integrated by B lymphocytes. Similar to CD20, another four-pass transmembrane protein, claudin 18.2, has attracted attention as an emerging therapeutic target for cancer. However, their poor solubility and toxic nature often hinder downstream applications, such as antibody drug development. Therefore, developing a cost-effective method for producing drug targets with multiple membrane-spanning domains is crucial. In this study, a high yield of recombinant CD20 was achieved through an E. coli-based in vitro coupled transcription-translation system. Surface plasmon resonance results showed that rituximab (an antileukemia drug) has nanomolar affinity with the CD20 protein, which aligns with published results. Notably, a previously hard-to-express claudin 18.2 recombinant protein was successfully expressed in the same reaction system by replacing its membrane-spanning domains with the transmembrane domains of CD20. The folding of the extracellular domain of the chimeric protein was verified using a commercial anti-claudin 18 antibody. This study provides a novel concept for promoting the expression of four-pass transmembrane proteins and lays the foundation for the large-scale industrial production of membrane-associated drug targets, similar to claudin 18.2.

Systemic administration of anti-CD20 indirectly reduces B cells in the inflamed meninges in a chronic model of central nervous system autoimmunity.

Anti-CD20 B cell depleting therapies have demonstrated that B cells are important drivers of disease progress in Multiple Sclerosis, although the pathogenic mechanisms are not well understood. A population of B cells accumulates in the inflamed meninges in MS and also some chronic animal models of disease, typically adjacent to demyelinating lesions. The role of these meningeal B cells in disease is not known, nor is their susceptibility to anti-CD20 therapy. Here, we administered anti-CD20 to 2D2 IgHMOG spontaneous experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice in the chronic phase of disease, after the establishment of meningeal B cell clusters. Compared to the circulation, lymph nodes, and spleen, B cell depletion from the meninges was delayed and not evident until 7d post-administration of anti-CD20. Further, we did not find evidence that anti-CD20 accessed meningeal B cells directly, but rather that depletion was indirect and the result of ongoing turnover of the meningeal population and elimination of the peripheral pool from which it is sustained.

Cross-Reactivity of Antibodies to Rituximab with Other Therapeutic Anti-CD20 Antibodies.

One reason for a lack of response to rituximab as well as infusion-related anaphylactic adverse events is the development of antidrug Abs to rituximab. Besides rituximab, a number of other therapeutic Abs targeting CD20 are nowadays available as alternatives. In this study, we investigated the potential cross-reactivity of (human) anti-rituximab Abs to three other anti-CD20 mAbs: ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, and ocrelizumab. In 25 cases of anti-rituximab Abs, cross-reactivity was examined using both direct binding assays and inhibition immunoassays. Although no cross-reactivity was observed to ofatumumab or obinutuzumab, 8 of 25 samples also showed reactivity toward ocrelizumab in at least one of the two assays. Furthermore, in three cases of anti-ocrelizumab Abs, cross-reactivity to rituximab was observed in an inhibition immunoassay, albeit not in a direct binding assay. Our results suggest that obinutuzumab or ofatumumab are safe anti-CD20 alternatives in case of the presence of anti-rituximab Abs. It is advisable to proceed cautiously if switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab (or vice versa) is considered in case these alternatives may not be available.

Development of Stable CHO-K1 Cell Lines Overexpressing Full-Length Human CD20 Antigen.

Background: CD20 is a differentiation-related antigen exclusively expressed on the membrane of B lymphocytes. CD20 amplification is observed in numerous immune-related disorders, making it an ideal target for immunotherapy of hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. MAb-based therapies targeting CD20 have a principal role in the treatment of several immune-related disordes and cancers, including CLL. Fc gamma receptors mediate CD20 internalization in hematopoietic cells; therefore, this study aimed to establish non-hematopoietic stable cell lines overexpressing full-length human CD20 antigen as an in vitro model for CD20-related studies. Methods: CD20 gene was cloned into the transfer vector. The lentivirus system was transfected to packaging HEK 293T cells, and the supernatants were harvested. CHO-K1 cells were transduced using recombinant viruses, and a stable cell pool was developed by the antibiotic selection. CD20 expression was confirmed at the mRNA and protein levels. Results: Simultaneous expression of GFP protein facilitated the detection of CD20-expressing cells. Immunophenotyping analysis of stable clones demonstrated expression of CD20 antigen. In addition, the mean fluorescence intensity was significantly higher in the CD20-CHO-K1 clones than the wild-type CHO-K1 cells. Conclusion: This study is the first report on using second-generation lentiviral vectors for the establishment of a non-hematopoietic cell-based system, which stably expresses full-length human CD20 antigen. Results of stable CHO cell lines with different levels of CD20 antigen are well suited to be used for CD20-based investigations, including binding and functional assays.

Effective clearance of rituximab-resistant tumor cells by breaking the mirror-symmetry of immunoglobulin G and simultaneous binding to CD55 and CD20.

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which eliminates aberrant target cells through the assembly and complex formation of serum complement molecules, is one of the major effector functions of anticancer therapeutic antibodies. In this study, we discovered that breaking the symmetry of natural immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies significantly increased the CDC activity of anti-CD20 antibodies. In addition, the expression of CD55 (a checkpoint inhibitor in the CDC cascade) was significantly increased in a rituximab-resistant cell line generated in-house, suggesting that CD55 overexpression might be a mechanism by which cancer cells acquire rituximab resistance. Based on these findings, we developed an asymmetric bispecific antibody (SBU-CD55 × CD20) that simultaneously targets both CD55 and CD20 to effectively eliminate rituximab-resistant cancer cells. In various cancer cell lines, including rituximab-resistant lymphoma cells, the SBU-CD55 × CD20 antibody showed significantly higher CDC activity than either anti-CD20 IgG antibody alone or a combination of anti-CD20 IgG antibody and anti-CD55 IgG antibody. Furthermore, the asymmetric bispecific antibody (SBU-CD55 × CD20) exhibited significantly higher CDC activity against rituximab-resistant cancer cells compared to other bispecific antibodies with symmetric features. These results demonstrate that enhancing CDC with an asymmetric CD55-binding bispecific antibody could be a new strategy for developing therapeutics to treat patients with relapsed or refractory cancers.

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy: Pathogenesis, risk of infection, and disease management.

Hypogammaglobulinemia is characterized by reduced serum immunoglobulin levels. Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is of considerable interest to the practicing physician because it is a potential complication of some medications and may predispose patients to serious infections. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with B-cell-depleting anti-CD20 therapies are particularly at risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia. Among these patients, hypogammaglobulinemia has been associated with an increased risk of infections. The mechanism by which hypogammaglobulinemia arises with anti-CD20 therapies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab, rituximab) remains unclear and does not appear to be simply due to the reduction in circulating B-cell levels. Further, despite the association between anti-CD20 therapies, hypogammaglobulinemia, and infections, there is currently no generally accepted monitoring and treatment approach among clinicians treating patients with MS. Here, we review the literature and discuss possible mechanisms of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with MS, hypogammaglobulinemia results in MS anti-CD20 therapy clinical trials, the risk of infection for patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, and possible strategies for disease management. We also include a suggested best-practice approach to specifically address secondary hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with MS treated with anti-CD20 therapies.

Measurement of Trogocytosis: Quantitative Analyses Validated with Rigorous Controls.

Trogocytosis is a process in which receptors on acceptor cells remove and internalize cognate ligands from donor cells. Trogocytosis has a profound and negative impact on mAb-based cancer immunotherapy, as seen in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with CD20 mAbs, such as rituximab (RTX) and ofatumumab (OFA). Our clinical observations of RTX/OFA-mediated loss of the CD20 target from circulating CLL cells have been replicated in our in vitro studies. Here we describe flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy experiments, which demonstrate that acceptor cells, such as monocytes/macrophages that express FcγR, remove and internalize both antigen and donor cell-bound cognate IgG mAbs for several different mAb-donor cell pairs. Fluorescent mAbs and portions of the plasma cell membrane are transferred from donor cells to acceptor cells, which include the THP-1 monocytic cell line as well as freshly isolated monocytes. We describe rigorous controls to validate the reactions and eliminate dissociation or internalization as alternative mechanisms. Trogocytosis is likely to contribute to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and liver damage associated with use of antibody-drug conjugates. The methods we have described should allow for examination of strategies focused on blocking trogocytosis and its adverse effects. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Trogocytosis of mAb-opsonized donor cells mediated by adherent THP-1 cells Alternate Protocol: Application of fluorescence microscopy to examine THP-1 cell-mediated trogocytosis Support Protocol 1: Alexa labeling of mAbs and determination of F/P ratios Support Protocol 2: Standard washing procedure Support Protocol 3: Labeling and opsonization of cells Basic Protocol 2: Trogocytosis mediated by human monocytes as acceptor cells Support Protocol 4: Isolation of human monocytes Basic Protocol 3: Trogocytosis mediated by THP-1 cells in solution Support Protocol 5: Retinoic acid treatment of THP-1 cells Support Protocol 6: Culturing of SCC-25, BT-474, MOLT-4 and THP-1 cell lines.

Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, but not rituximab, trigger complement induction in vitro.

The clinical and adverse effects of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab in multiple sclerosis (MS) are presently subject to extensive study. While the two former are approved for MS, the older and less costly rituximab is used off label, and adverse effect profiles are important in their evaluation. The three mAbs all induce B cell depletion, with complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) as one of several mechanisms of action. Complement activation is also postulated to underlie adverse reactions related to infusion/injection. Such administration-related reactions are associated with all three mAbs, but comparisons have so far been indirect, resting on incidence reports from separate clinical trials. The objective of this study was to perform head-to-head comparison of complement activation by ofatumumab, ocrelizumab and rituximab. In vitro experiments were performed in whole blood from healthy donors. The complement-activating potential of the three mAbs was analyzed after 30 min of exposure to 0.3 mg/mL or 0.9 mg/mL of each drug, and compared with those of the well-known TNF inhibitory mAbs adalimumab and infliximab, the latter with recognized potential for infusion reactions. Ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, and infliximab, but not rituximab and adalimumab, triggered statistically significant complement activation measured as increased levels of terminal C5b-9 complement complex (TCC), a sensitive marker of such activation. While results demand careful interpretation, they provide an indication of distinct complement-inducing potential among anti-CD20 mAbs currently used to treat MS.

Alternative splicing of its 5'-UTR limits CD20 mRNA translation and enables resistance to CD20-directed immunotherapies.

Aberrant skipping of coding exons in CD19 and CD22 compromises the response to immunotherapy in B-cell malignancies. Here, we showed that the MS4A1 gene encoding human CD20 also produces several messenger RNA (mRNA) isoforms with distinct 5' untranslated regions. Four variants (V1-4) were detected using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) at distinct stages of normal B-cell differentiation and B-lymphoid malignancies, with V1 and V3 being the most abundant. During B-cell activation and Epstein-Barr virus infection, redirection of splicing from V1 to V3 coincided with increased CD20 positivity. Similarly, in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, only V3, but not V1, correlated with CD20 protein levels, suggesting that V1 might be translation-deficient. Indeed, the longer V1 isoform contained upstream open reading frames and a stem-loop structure, which cooperatively inhibited polysome recruitment. By modulating CD20 isoforms with splice-switching morpholino oligomers, we enhanced CD20 expression and anti-CD20 antibody rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity in a panel of B-cell lines. Furthermore, reconstitution of CD20-knockout cells with V3 mRNA led to the recovery of CD20 positivity, whereas V1-reconstituted cells had undetectable levels of CD20 protein. Surprisingly, in vitro CD20-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells were able to kill both V3- and V1-expressing cells, but the bispecific T-cell engager mosunetuzumab was only effective against V3-expressing cells. To determine whether CD20 splicing is involved in immunotherapy resistance, we performed RNA-seq on 4 postmosunetuzumab follicular lymphoma relapses and discovered that in 2 of them, the downregulation of CD20 was accompanied by a V3-to-V1 shift. Thus, splicing-mediated mechanisms of epitope loss extend to CD20-directed immunotherapies.

CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibodies for lymphoma therapy: latest updates from ASCO 2023 annual meeting.

Multiple bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have been approved for cancer immunotherapy. Several CD20 × CD3 bsAbs have demonstrated significant anti-B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) activity by engaging T cells to target CD20+ NHL cells in clinical trials. Mosunetuzumab, epcoritamab and glofitamab have been approved recently for B-cell NHL therapy. In this study, we summarized several latest reports on CD20 × CD3 bsAbs for the therapy of B-cell NHL from the ASCO 2023 annual meeting (ASCO2023).

Pharmacogenomic Analyses Implicate B Cell Developmental Status and MKL1 as Determinants of Sensitivity toward Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy directed against CD20 is an important tool in the treatment of B cell disorders. However, variable patient response and acquired resistance remain important clinical challenges. To identify genetic factors that may influence sensitivity to treatment, the cytotoxic activity of three CD20 mAbs: rituximab; ofatumumab; and obinutuzumab, were screened in high-throughput assays using 680 ethnically diverse lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) followed by a pharmacogenomic assessment. GWAS analysis identified several novel gene candidates. The most significant SNP, rs58600101, in the gene MKL1 displayed ethnic stratification, with the variant being significantly more prevalent in the African cohort and resulting in reduced transcript levels as measured by qPCR. Functional validation of MKL1 by shRNA-mediated knockdown of MKL1 resulted in a more resistant phenotype. Gene expression analysis identified the developmentally associated TGFB1I1 as the most significant gene associated with sensitivity. qPCR among a panel of sensitive and resistant LCLs revealed immunoglobulin class-switching as well as differences in the expression of B cell activation markers. Flow cytometry showed heterogeneity within some cell lines relative to surface Ig isotype with a shift to more IgG+ cells among the resistant lines. Pretreatment with prednisolone could partly reverse the resistant phenotype. Results suggest that the efficacy of anti-CD20 mAb therapy may be influenced by B cell developmental status as well as polymorphism in the MKL1 gene. A clinical benefit may be achieved by pretreatment with corticosteroids such as prednisolone followed by mAb therapy.

Complement system in Anti-CD20 mAb therapy for cancer: A mini-review.

The complement system is an important part of innate immunity. Through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), it plays an important role in the clearance of invading pathogens but also cancerous host cells. Therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), for example, rituximab and ofatumumab, is a well-established treatment for lymphoid malignancies, and CDC is one of the main mechanisms underlying their anti-cancer activity. However, there are still some issues with the clinical application of anti-CD20 antibodies. On the one hand, anti-CD20 can cause some clinical side effects; on the other hand, anti-CD20 has low potency in some patients, and increasing the dosage does not enhance its effectiveness in these patients. Previous studies have reported that a gain-of-function in a certain complement component can boost the cytolytic activity of anti-CD20 mAbs. Through reviewing the literature on complement system control and anti-CD20 mAbs, this article aims to provide a thorough understanding of the potential of targeting complement components in lymphoma therapy.